pcbaqualityprocessauditrev3[1].0(中英文對照).xls

IFT 详见备注 *

PCBA 质量过程审核

在已审核项相应栏填入 "Y"

#	审核标准	1, 2	3, 4	5, 6	7, 8	9, 10
1. O	perator and Work Instructions(1.操作员及作业指导)	Enter 1	or 0. NA may be a v	alid response for s	haded cells.^
NO	. 内容	得分	未得分原因	改善对策	得分的详细状况	责任人	备注
1.1	~~Is there a revision controlled Test Instruction which contains unique details for the specific~~ product being tested? (Score 0 if any unsigned/undated handwritten instructions or any handwritten instructions more than 48 hrs old) 指定的正在测试的产品是否有唯一的受控的详细测试作业指导书？（如果发现有任何无签署/无日期的手写的作业指导书或使用手写的作业指导书时间已超过48小时的，则该项记0分）
1.2	Are Work Instructions readilyavailable to the test operator and are theyfollowed? 是否有作业指导书可以供测试作业员使用或测试作业员是否按测试作业指导书来作业？
1.3	Is the Test File name and number specified on Work Instructions? 在作业指导书中是否有指定的测试文件名及文件号？
1.4	Is the Test File traceable to a specific PCBA part number and revision level and to the Unit Under Test?
	对于一个指定的PCBA P/N、版本号以及正在测试的产品来说，其测试文件是否可追溯？
1.5	Does the test Operator have the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the tester available to them at all times?
	是否总有可用的SOP供操作员使用？
1.6	Is there evidence that the Operator been trained and certified against the Standard Operating Procedure for the Tester?
	是否有证据证明操作员接受过SOP培训及其是否能鉴定测试机台的SOP？
1.7	Does the Operator know the content of the Standard Operating Procedure for the Tester and do they and follow it?
	操作员是否了解测试装置的SOP的内容及其是否按SOP操作？
1.8	Are Operators required to log in at the Test station and does this provide an automatic verification of trainingstatus?
	是否有要求作业员操作机台？这是否就自动验证了操作员的培训情况？
2. F	n Test Fixture(2. Fn Test治具)	1,2	3,4	5,6	7,8	9,10
2.1	Is the Test fixture identified with a name or number? 测试治具有没有用名称或号码来标识？
2.2	Is the Preventative Maintenance / Calibration sticker on the fixture current and upto date? 对目前使用的或过期的ICT治具有没有进行预防性的维护及校正？
2.3	Is there a Preventative Maintenanceprocedure and schedule for each Test fixture?
	第1頁有没有对ICT治具进行预防性的维护及校正的程序和日程表？

2.4	Is there evidence to demonstrate that Preventative Maintenance records are up-to-date?
	有没有证据来证明该预防性的维护记录已过期？
2.5	Are NDF rates used to flaga test station maintenance schedule?
	NDF率是否用于标记测试机台维护时间表？
2.6	Are theregoals for NDF reduction specified for eachproduct and each fixture? 是否有指定的每个产品及测试治具的NDF率减少的目标？
2.7	Are spareparts for test stocked?
	用于测试的多余的元件是否有存放？
2.8	Is the inventoryof spare testparts adequatelycontrolled?
	库存测试治具元件的盘点清单是否充分受控？
3. Fn	Test Software(3. Fn Test 软件)	1,2 3,4	5,6	7,8	9,10
3.1	Are all Fn Test systems networked to a server?
	是否所有的测试系统都与网络服务器相连？
3.2	Is the Functional Test software downloaded from a central server when the program is called up and at least dailythereafter?
	当推出测试程式且其后最少每天一次编辑程式时，功能测试软件是否是从中央服务器下载的？
3.3	Is the Fn Test software revision controlled forprogram changes?
	程式更改时，功能测试软件版本是否受控？
3.4	Is a control method used to logall changes to the Fn Testprogram and is it available?
	是否有一个记录功能测试程式的所有变更的可行的控制方法？
4. Tes	t Operation(4. Test 操作)	1,2 3,4	5, 6	7, 8	9,10
4.1	Is there an automated method of loadingtestprograms?
	是否有自动装载测试程式方法？
4.2	Is there a documented and agreed convention outlining the storage of untested, failed, and pass boards?
	对没有测试的，测试通不过的以及通过测试的板的存储是否有文件证明及确认会议？
4.3	Are boards marked in some way to facilitate the implementation of this convention? (Forced Routing is acceptable.)
	是否按该会议确定的办法在板上做相应的标识？（强制流程可接受）
4.4	Are boards awaiting test identified and stored separately according to the convention OR routed via a dedicated conveyor?

第 2 頁

	待测板是否可识别并根据会议确定的办法单独存放或通过专门的传送装置发送？
4.5	Are passing boards identified and stored separately according to the convention OR routed via a dedicated conveyor?
	测试通过的板是否可识别并根据会议确定的办法单独存放或通过专门的传送装置发送？
4.6	Are failing boards identified and stored separately according to the convention OR routed via a dedicated conveyor?
	测试通不过的板是否可识别并根据会议确定的办法单独存放或通过专门的传送装置发送？
4.7	Arepass and failed boards stored on different storage carts OR routed via a unique conveyor? 测试通过的板与测试通不过的板是否放在不同的仓库或通过专门的传送装置发送？
4.8	Is SPC data collected and effectivelyused at thisprocesspoint?
	是否收集了SPC数据并在这个程序中有效地使用？
4.9	Is the content of the SPC data chart up-to-date?
	SPC数据表中的内容是否过期？
4.1	Are out of control SPC datapoints effectivelyactioned?
	对超出受控SPC数据点有没有采取有效的改善措施？
4.11	Are Fn Test buffer trigger points established to ensure process shut down should the limits be exceeded?
	功能测试缓冲开关是否为公认的能够确保关闭此过程时不会超出范围？
4.12	Has a Gauge R&R study been completed in accordance with Dell GR&R Procedures? (Doc No. COR.40.WWP.SQ.0207)
	是否已依照DELL的GR&R程序对标准的R&R进行了学习？（文件COR.40.WWP.SQ.0207)
4.13	Is test coverage calculated based on the total number of functions and features versus those that are exercised?(See Dell Feature Summary)
	测试涵盖率是否根据与那些已做测试的相对应的功能特征的总数来计算的？（见DELL特征概要）
5. Fn	Test WIP Tracking(5. Fn Test WIP 跟踪)	1,2 3,4	5, 6	7, 8	9,10
5.1	Is a Forced Board Routingsystem and WIP Tackingsystem fullydeployed throughout the testprocess? 是否在测试的整个过程使用了这个强行的板的流程系统及WIP跟踪系统？
5.2	Does the system verifythe 'last' step processed and compare it to the expected 'last' step?
	系统是否会验证进行的最后一步并且将其与期望中的最后一步作比较？
5.3	Do boards that PASS have an identifying mark to indicate their pass status? (Forced Routing is acceptable.)
	是否会在测试已通过的板上作标识以表明测试通过？（可接受强行流程）
5.4	~~第3 頁~~ Do boards that FAIL have an identifying mark to indicate their fail status? (Forced Routing is acceptable.)

预览结束 · 共 5 页

下载完整版